EasyDMARC alternative: self-hosted & open source
An open-source, self-hosted EasyDMARC alternative with unlimited domains and no report data leaving your servers — DMARC monitoring you run and own yourself.
EasyDMARC is a polished, approachable hosted platform with a broad set of tools. It is vendor-hosted, with a free plan for a single domain and paid tiers that cap domains and scale by message volume. DMARC Analyzer trades hosted convenience for ownership: open source, self-hosted, unlimited domains, and data on your own infrastructure.
Side by side
EasyDMARC’s plans as published in July 2026; check their pricing page for current terms.
| DMARC Analyzer | EasyDMARC | |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self-hosted | Vendor cloud |
| Open source | Yes (Apache-2.0) | No |
| Free tier | Everything, unlimited domains | Yes — 1 domain, 14 days of history |
| Paid plans | None | From ~$36/month, capped by domains + volume |
| History retained | As long as you keep it | 3 months to 3 years, by plan |
| Your report data | Stays on your infrastructure | Processed in the vendor’s cloud |
| Agencies / many clients | Yes, self-hosted multi-tenant | Yes, on paid plans |
| Wider tool suite (BIMI, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT) | — | Yes |
Where EasyDMARC fits
If you want the easiest possible hosted onboarding and a wide built-in tool suite in one dashboard, EasyDMARC delivers that.
Where DMARC Analyzer fits
If you’d rather self-host, monitor unlimited domains without tier limits, and keep client data on infrastructure you control, DMARC Analyzer is the open-source alternative. If a checker flags problems, our guide on why email fails DMARC walks through the fixes.
Worth being plain about the overlap: if you only have one domain to watch and don’t mind a 14-day report window, EasyDMARC’s free tier gets you a hosted dashboard with zero setup. Self-hosting buys unlimited domains and unlimited history, not necessarily a faster start — that trade only pays off once you have more than one domain, or want the data to never leave your own server.
Named products are trademarks of their respective owners. This comparison reflects our understanding at the time of writing and may change; corrections are welcome via the GitHub repository.